Appeals court vacates Amazon’s injunction against Perplexity

The Ninth Circuit vacated the preliminary injunction against Perplexity’s Comet assistant and remanded. On the record before it, the panel found Amazon unlikely to prove that Perplexity itself accessed Amazon’s computers under federal and California computer-access laws.

An injunction appeal, not the whole lawsuit

The Ninth Circuit vacated the March preliminary injunction that had restricted Perplexity's Comet assistant on Amazon and remanded the case. Its published opinion and contemporary reporting date the appellate action to August 4. [1][2]

On the record presented, the panel concluded that users accessed Amazon's computers with the assistant's help, making Amazon unlikely to succeed on the computer-access claims. The opinion expressly limited that analysis to the technology and facts before it, left other potential forms of liability unaddressed and preserved Amazon's ability to regulate access through private terms. It did not grant agents unrestricted access to websites or finally dispose of every claim. [1]

Sources

  1. Amazon.com Services, LLC v. Perplexity AI, Inc., No. 26-1444

    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 4, 2026

  2. Appeals Court Sides Against Amazon, Lifts Perplexity Ban

    MediaPost · Aug 4, 2026